• @JcbAzPx
    link
    English
    14 hours ago

    You wouldn’t stop WWII, but you would drastically change its nature.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      04 hours ago

      Get rid of Hitler and you just end up with President Himmler instead. Virtually nothing else changes.

        • @UnderpantsWeevil
          link
          English
          12 hours ago

          You can argue with a philosopher over that. But certain historical events can be over-determined, with enough causal factors prompting them that a given outcome is functionally inevitable.

          • @RememberTheApollo_
            link
            English
            11 hour ago

            Perhaps odds may favor “macro” events like “war”. They do not predict which countries are invaded, the brutality of the leader, the alliances, who the leader is, concentration camps, etc. but not a “Hitler”.

            • @UnderpantsWeevil
              link
              English
              144 minutes ago

              If you want to go back in time and prevent the Holocaust specifically, your time would be better well spent killing Henry Ford or Arthur de Gobineau or Martin Luther. Mass murder of Jews in Europe had been common place for centuries. It was a sentiment the Nazis capitalized on, not one they invented.

              Similarly, if you wanted to deter shape of European politics that lead to the World Wars, temporal assassination of Bismark or Napoleon III would be far more effective. Those battle lines had been drawn well in advance of 1932.