• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
    link
    -2
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I don’t see any flaw. The meaning of that sentence is very clear.

    If the post lead with that then maybe there wouldn’t be any complaints.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 hours ago

      It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

      • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
        link
        -2
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        You asked “Am wrong?”.

        The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 hours ago

          Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

          Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.