The Gemini protocol is brutally simple, which makes it just about too useless for apps, tracking, and commercial purposes. Gemtext, the format for Gemini pages, is very basic; with about half as many features as markdown, it’s barely a step above plain text. As a result, Gemini is a small universe of blogs and personal sites.

Its simplicity makes it easy for people to create compatible clients and services for it. It’s self-hosting friendly and there are also hosting services, like smol.pub and some pubnixes.

Of course, you’ll need to get a Gemini browser or visit a Gemini-to-web proxy to access it.

  • @Windex007
    link
    92 days ago

    I know what JavaScript is.

    I’m saying any language could perform the same function.

    My issue is with the design of the language and its gargbage feature set.

    • @moseschrute
      link
      12 days ago

      What would you change about JavaScript? Like specific language features you don’t like. Not general statements.

      • @Valmond
        link
        11 day ago

        Try to learn it and you’ll see!

        At least if you know programming beforehand.

        • @moseschrute
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’ve been writing JavaScript for 10 years, the majority of that professionally. I have a formal education in computer science. In college, I wrote Java, assembly, C, Python, Lisp, Prolog, and SQL. Outside of school, I’ve written Go, Rust, Ruby, and probably dabbled in a bunch of others.

          As someone that knows programming and that has learned JavaScript, I don’t get the sense that people here have actually given JavaScript a fair chance. Sure, it’s not without its issues, but why don’t you learn it and see?

          Voyager, which I believe is the most popular Lemmy iOS client, is written in JavaScript. It’s a fantastic app. There are a bunch of people that love hating on JS, but there are also a bunch of people that hate being locked into cloud services that can be shut down at any time. JavaScript allows you to build local-first apps that are less dependent on a server (obviously, backend is still a thing).

          • @Valmond
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Learn C++ or a modern high level language (not Java). You seem stuck in the old stuff which might be why you don’t see the obvious flaws with js.

            That a nice program is written in a language says nothing positive about the language IMO. Everything was written in old clunky languages at a certain point.

            • @moseschrute
              link
              11 day ago

              Lol isn’t C++ insanely bloated? Surely there are more modern languages. Like Zig maybe?

              Also I mentioned I’ve written Rust and Go, which are pretty modern. I’d be interested in learning Zig if I had more time. As for the other languages, CS programs just use older languages, but it was more about learning the concepts like data structures.

              But it’s very much a right tool for the right job. JavaScript is a very good tool for front end development. C++ is a very good tool for writing a rendering pipeline or doing signal processing (I’m guessing idk I haven’t tried doing that stuff).

              But my original read in this thread was “JavaScript sucks” not “JavaScript sucks when you use it for the wrong task”. It doesn’t suck, but I agree don’t use it for the wrong task.

      • @Windex007
        link
        6
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Types?

        Edit:

        For clarity, consider all the shit an actual real production scenario demands of layering on library after library and framework after fucking framework to make it usable.

        Nobody even USES “JavaScript”, they use like 7 layers to try and turn it into a production ready environment.

        Why.

        Because JavaScript sucks.

        Look at what they need to mimic a fraction of what other languages come with out of the box.

        • @moseschrute
          link
          02 days ago

          TypeScript solves most of your type issues. Zod gives you runtime enforcement of those types if you want, if you can stomach installing a library. But it’s true it’s not actually a statically typed language with built-in runtime enforcement of types. I hope in the next 5-10 years we see browsers that are able to run TypeScript with both runtime enforcement and performance benefits from using actual static typing. But IMO TypeScript is good enough solving most of the type problems with JavaScript.

          You’re welcome to use as many or as few libraries as you want. There are tons of JavaScript libraries, and some of those libraries have way too many dependencies. But if you cut through the noise, there are actually a lot of high-quality libraries that don’t have an absurd number of dependencies and bring a lot of value.

          JavaScript is by no means perfect, but I think it’s become trendy to hate on it. Every language has its issues. JavaScript has done an amazing job outgrowing many of its problems. Growth has brought new problems, but I’ve been writing JS/TypeScript for 10 years, and would not like to go back to JS 10 years ago. It kind of sucked compared to today.