- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I don’t think he should have included the starting frame-- if the cursor were theoretically instant, his method records it with a 1 frame delay, and this +1 frame error happens on every test. Correcting this actually makes Wayland more laggy proportionally, although it makes both less laggy absolutely.
Good analysis
Thanks. Also, after a bit of thought, i do believe you are right saying that we should remove one frame of all the raw camera data. … it will, as you say, decrease the absolute values and make Wayland more laggy proportionally, yet, it doesn’t change the absolute difference.