• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 month ago

    True, and not at all related to the point I was truing to make.

    “America’s favorite color” has a ballot featuring chartreuse, mauve, and taupe. This ballot cannot recognize a majority opinion of red, blue, or green. Those options are simply not present.

    Likewise, the ballot we were given in November had no ability to recognize “no genocide” as a majority opinion.

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      01 month ago

      A ballot is like a train, it gets you as close to your destination as possible

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        That’s a reasonable analogy.

        Of course, when every station is further from your destination than from where you originally started, there’s no point in even getting on the train.

        • @T00l_shed
          link
          01 month ago

          Sure, but if no station would get you anywhere close to where you want to be I’m not sure what you’re looking for from any political party.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            I’m merely describing how the ballot was incapable of recognizing the majority position of “No Genocide”: There were no “No Genocide” options available on the ballot. One cannot rationally conclude that the majority wanted genocide simply because a genocidal candidate won the election: There was no “no genocide” candidate to vote for.

            If the ballot is a train, the stations on this line are at the sewage treatment plant, the garbage dump, a stagnant swamp, and a rendering plant.

            • @T00l_shed
              link
              -21 month ago

              The majority position was clearly pro genocide, hence trumps win. And as per the train analogy getting closer to the no genocide stop means not voting for the repubs, there was a better chance under Kamala.