• KSP Atlas
    link
    fedilink
    153 days ago

    C++ is better suited to lower level operations than Go, C++ can have huge control over the environment (allowing it to be run on bare metal with no OS) while Go is limited due to it using a garbage collector

    If there was a replacement for C++, the best bet IMO would be Zig

    • @stetech
      link
      22 days ago

      As someone who knows neither of the three: Why Zig over Rust as a Cpp replacement?

      • @ZILtoid1991
        link
        21 day ago

        Rust has its own issues.

        Before the memory safety craze, Rust was hyped as a functional programming language, meaning it not only has lambdas and monads, but also const by default, which will force you to rethink all your programming decisions. Also no classes, so you do even more rethinking.

        • optional
          link
          fedilink
          220 hours ago

          I don’t just rethink my programming decision but all my life decisions every night. Seem like Rust is the perfect language for me.

      • @dejected_warp_core
        link
        42 days ago

        As someone who just picked through the Zig docs (take this with a mountain of salt), Zig has a few things going for it:

        • spec is simple and closer to C in scope
        • modern language design, toolchain, and overall ergonomics
        • Go-like struct & interface system
        • 1st-class C interoperability

        Go foists co-routines on you and the runtime, and Rust has the borrow checker. Both of these things deeply impact language design, standard libraries, and the overall developer experience. So Zig might actually be a “more modern C” in many ways which makes it a contender. That said, it’s not a 1:1 comparsion since it lacks everything else that C++ does: you’d have to re-envision your software designs as something other than OOP if that’s what you’re used to.