• @Gradually_Adjusting
    link
    English
    739 days ago

    The thing about market cap is that it’s kinda not real. You think Rivian was ever worth 130 billion dollars, for example? Nah.

    Nvidia has only lost about the last three months of stock gains. It’s quite bad, and they’ll cry, but they’ll be fine in the long term.

    • @edgemaster72
      link
      English
      189 days ago

      “Long term? But I want all the money now!”

    • Rob Bos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 days ago

      They really need to change how market cap is calculated. Even a linear function going to zero as the last share is sold would be better. I wonder.

      • @Gradually_Adjusting
        link
        English
        119 days ago

        I think it would make more sense to have good journalism and honest coverage of markets, and an informed, financially literate populace. While I’m at it I want a pony who cleans the dishes and shits sunglasses.

    • veroxii
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49 days ago

      Well yeah. The market cap is all the stock x the current market price. But if even a few % of people sell then the price will drop. You can never sell everything at the top price.

      • @Gradually_Adjusting
        link
        English
        99 days ago

        Pretty typical that the only ones to suffer any lasting harm will be the longs and shorts who weren’t first to act.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          59 days ago

          Yeah. I think long term, many advancements in Ai will still need Nvidia chips and it will be better to have more of them still.

          • Ephera
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 days ago

            I mean, stock price rarely correlates with actual need and more with just hype. If you expect many people to buy a given stock, it makes sense for you to buy before them. If you expect many people to sell a given stock, it makes sense for you to sell before them. The actual need kind of just provides a baseline, i.e. even if the hype dies off completely, it’ll still make some profit and pay out some fraction from that to anyone who’s willing to park their money there.

          • @Gradually_Adjusting
            link
            English
            19 days ago

            As to genuine AI needing better GPUs, I’ll believe it when Jeff Hawkins says it’s so.

              • @Gradually_Adjusting
                link
                English
                29 days ago

                I’ve read a couple of his books, and he’s been developing a theory of human intelligence with the express goal of creating true AGI. His Thousand Brains book espouses a theory I find just about credible and, perhaps eventually, actionable.

                It’s all to do with cortical columns working in parallel on a pseudo-voting type of system. If at some point he says “we know how to make AGI now, but we’re going to need really good GPUs”, I will find that credible based on having read his work.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  39 days ago

                  Yeah. I dont think what we have now is general intelligence. It’s just word prediction models. But they still manage to give an impression of intelligence. I think there will be some big change at some time where Ai models will use some different technology and probably give something closer to actual thinking.

                  • @Gradually_Adjusting
                    link
                    English
                    69 days ago

                    Oh, nobody thinks what we have now is AGI. Not even the AI thinks it’s AGI. It’s just a words firehose being hyped to hell and gone because billionaires are so excited to fire their employees that they’re jumping the gun.