I don’t know if I’m opening a can of worms here, and I’m still trying to backtrack a lot of history where I was tuning everything out. I keep seeing random swipes at Signal (or the representatives (?)), and I was wondering whether they are founded or just lies.Is it another situation like Lemmy where we just “take the technology and move on”? Thanks!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever seen people say it has CIA financial backing. It did however until only a couple of years ago have strong ties to the State Department’s Open Tech Fund (from the same financial envelope that brings you RFA/RFE/VOA).

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      238 days ago

      The main developer of Lemmy seems to think there’s a solid connection. I’m not jumping in that fight, I got no dog in that fight, I don’t have that kind of threat model.

      https://dessalines.github.io/essays/why_not_signal.html#cia-funding

      However, considering he’s openly Marxist, he may be just slightly biased.

      I suspect OP of this post actually saw the recent /c/Privacy thread over at lemmy.ml where Dessalines was proselytizing against Signal while not seeming to have a problem with SimpleX chat being funded by a group of Venture Capital investors, including Jack Dorsey.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        158 days ago

        Openly Marxist is just the start of it. Dude is utterly unhinged, so his theories don’t mean a lot to me unless they’re backed by evidence.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        28 days ago

        I think he also avoid criticizing tele which is even more swiss cheese than signal