Me personally? I’ve become much less tolerant of sexist humor. Back in the day, cracking a joke at women’s expense was pretty common when I was a teen. As I’ve matured and become aware to the horrific extent of toxicity and bigotry pervading all tiers of our individualistic society, I’ve come to see how exclusionarly and objectifying that sort of ‘humor’ really is, and I regret it deeply.

  • @samus12345
    link
    21 year ago

    It’s not coming from a religious position. Theistic religions tout gnostic theism, full stop. The reason agnostic vs gnostic atheism is a thing is purely because belief in god is such a big deal socially. It’s a claim that can’t help but be addressed because of how ingrained it is in everyday life (particularly in the US). If people were inclined to discriminate against you based on your belief or non-belief in vampires or Santa Claus, then your stance on them would be just as prominent. Your quote at the bottom is agnostic atheism, but it doesn’t necessarily say anything about being “open to religion.” If there were some sort of proof that a god or gods existed, it doesn’t mean that any religion is correct about them. For example, I know for a fact that the god of the Bible does not exist because he’s a clearly defined character and the nature of the world disproves his existence. However, I don’t claim to know that no gods exist, period.

    • @kicksystem
      link
      11 year ago

      Do gnostic atheist even exist? I think the distinction is only there to tease people who think that you can really know anything…

      • @samus12345
        link
        21 year ago

        They do, and people who think they know everything are very unpleasant to talk to!

        • @kicksystem
          link
          11 year ago

          Ugh, I can imagine. I think gnostic $anything$ would be unpleasant to talk to.