YouTube already has a 2x speed multiplier for videos that seem to go on a little too long. The company…

  • @CrayonRosary
    link
    English
    116 hours ago

    Saying “Try learning some X” the way you did is an insult. That’s not a polite way to refute someone’s comment. It’s just like saying “you’re ignorant”.

    If you had simply said your first sentence about the harmonics and left it at that, I would have replied, “Oh yeah, okay, that’s a good point.”

    Instead, you were a dick about it. Just letting you know how those words come across on the internet. Maybe you wouldn’t take those same words that way if they were said to you, but I did, and so would lots of other people.

    • @over_clox
      link
      English
      -116 hours ago

      Okay. Then try learning guitar tuning and 2x/4x harmonics. Way easier than learning 3x harmonics.

      If I sound like a dick about it, maybe you can hear the harmonics of my dick. I don’t care about your opinion of not researching stuff, I actually spent 6 years repairing guitars, and wrote my own tuner algorithm.

      • @CrayonRosary
        link
        English
        116 hours ago

        Wow, you just doubled down rather than showing me even a shred of understanding of my perspective…

        People like you only deserve to be blocked.

        • @over_clox
          link
          English
          115 hours ago

          This thread all started regarding their arbitrary speed limit on fast forward YouTube Premium.

          They already have all the technology they need to do 100x speed playback, if they wanted to. All they’d probably have to do is change one restricting constant in their code.

          Go ahead and block me if you find learning things offensive though, I only suggested educating yourself.