@[email protected] to Open [email protected]English • edit-27 days agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down113
arrow-up1406arrow-down1imageSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.ml@[email protected] to Open [email protected]English • edit-27 days agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-26 days agoAnyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
minus-squareDomilinkfedilink1•6 days agoAnyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes. I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon. If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.
Anyone can now provide that service. Why pay OpenAI when you can pay a different service who is cheaper or provides a service more aligned with your needs or ethics or legal requirements?
Anyone that has 300.000$ per instance, the know-how to set it up, the means to support it and can outbid OpenAI, yes.
I don’t see that happening on a large scale, just like I don’t see tons of DeepSeek instances being hosted cheaper than the original any time soon.
If they really are afraid of that they can always license it in a way that forbids reselling.