QuentinCallaghanM to Political [email protected]English • 1 month agoMeanwhile at DeepSeeksopuli.xyzimagemessage-square140fedilinkarrow-up1989arrow-down114
arrow-up1975arrow-down1imageMeanwhile at DeepSeeksopuli.xyzQuentinCallaghanM to Political [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square140fedilink
minus-square@474Dlink-1•1 month agoYou can do it in LM Studio in like 5 clicks, I’m currently using it.
minus-squareAtHeartEngineerlinkEnglish4•1 month agoRunning an uncensored deepseek model that doesn’t perform significantly worse than the regular deepseek models? I know how to dl and run models, I haven’t seen an uncensored deepseek model that performs as well as the baseline deepseek model
minus-square@474Dlink1•30 days agoI mean obviously you need to run a lower parameter model locally, that’s not a fault of the model, it’s just not having the same computational power
minus-squareAtHeartEngineerlinkEnglish2•30 days agoIn both cases I was talking about local models, deepseek-r1 32b parameter vs an equivalent that is uncensored from hugging face
You can do it in LM Studio in like 5 clicks, I’m currently using it.
Running an uncensored deepseek model that doesn’t perform significantly worse than the regular deepseek models? I know how to dl and run models, I haven’t seen an uncensored deepseek model that performs as well as the baseline deepseek model
I mean obviously you need to run a lower parameter model locally, that’s not a fault of the model, it’s just not having the same computational power
In both cases I was talking about local models, deepseek-r1 32b parameter vs an equivalent that is uncensored from hugging face