This is a good argument. But they could simply have fixed the grammar errors in edit. That would also explain the cloned heads used to cover something else. Also, there are a couple of suspicious hands. Still, i’m not 100% sure.
It’s also possible that “We 4 You!” is the intended message. Like if it’s that obvious, do you think the guy who had to add “prepare 4 launch” wouldn’t have noticed it and fixed it? Clearly some post-processing happened here.
There’s too many issues with the image. For example, why does the brown coat have buttons when it looks like a poncho?
Most of these “issues” are terrible arguments:
AI doesn’t duplicate heads. That’s kind of the whole point of AI. You know what does duplicate features? Lazy compositing.
It’s a retro-future movie. That’s a retro-future outfit.
and 9) Extras don’t know how to use 70 year old props? This is surprising?
We’re going to call out grammar errors, but ignore the flawless pencil drawing of the logo on the other poster?
This is a good argument. But they could simply have fixed the grammar errors in edit. That would also explain the cloned heads used to cover something else. Also, there are a couple of suspicious hands. Still, i’m not 100% sure.
It’s also possible that “We 4 You!” is the intended message. Like if it’s that obvious, do you think the guy who had to add “prepare 4 launch” wouldn’t have noticed it and fixed it? Clearly some post-processing happened here.
I read that as “We O(we) U” and to make it fit the theme they painted a 4 in the middle.