• @victron
    link
    English
    36
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Joe Cool
      link
      fedilink
      English
      631 year ago

      You could always use a distro made by sane people.

      • @victron
        link
        English
        18
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          As a user of Windows my entire life, I’ve tried Ubuntu and Manjaro before and went back to Windows. I randomly felt like trying Linux again recently and set up Debian 12, and am finally not going back.

          • @victron
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            deleted by creator

        • Joe Cool
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          I have also used Ubuntu when they sent out those free CDs. And for work when they had the Unity desktop (12.04 LTS). It was a good distro once.
          I am pretty happy with the Arch (btw) I installed as a VM on Ubuntu 12.04 and then used as my main OS on the new work PC since 2017.

          • @victron
            link
            English
            4
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Yea do it. It boggles my mind why anyone would use Ubuntu at this point. Makes more sense to use Mint, even.

        • 伯谅 LCw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          This… If I wanted an app in snap form, I would install it through snap instead. But installing an app through apt redirects to snap? No. It’s ridiculous and unacceptable.

        • @victron
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        It makes sense that they don’t want to maintain 2 versions. What doesn’t make sense is that when you ask it for an apt, instead of saying “this package isn’t avalible as an apt” and maybe “by the way it is available as a snap if you want”, it just installs the snap without telling you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Canonical is not maintaining fuck-all. They’re just re-distributing Debian packages (sometimes with a few patches on top at most). The Debian team is doing all the heavy lifting of packaging software (including firefox-esr).

          It’s not a technical limitation that Canonical doesn’t offer firefox as a deb. It’s an intentional attempt to trap people into their walled garden.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say it was a technical limitation, I said it was laziness. Even if they just straight up take the deb from Debian, they are still responsible for if it works well on Ubuntu.

            Anyway, it’s hardly a very good trap. You can still download the deb from Debian, or use Mozilla’s ppa, or use flatpak. Or hell, snap is the main difference between Ubuntu and Debian at this point anyway, so just use any other Debian distro. I hate to be the person defending Canonical here as I vastly prefer community distros, but when the vast majority of people are using OSs from Microsoft, Apple and Google, painting Canonical as a big greedy villain sounds like a joke.

      • @victron
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        deleted by creator