• @Dasus
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

    I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

    You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

    You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.

    I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -47 hours ago

      No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.

      Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?

      • @Dasus
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.

        #No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

        Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.

        I added all my thoughts immediately.

        Not before I had already replied to you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -26 hours ago

          Idk what to tell you. Maybe you already had the threads loaded. Maybe my client needed an extra minute to update right there. I went back to my comment immediately after to add the edit and edit edit.

          Do you want me to be more sketch next time and not even try to add that I edited my comment. Or maybe next tiem I’ll add timestamps of when I edit every single word or sentence. But you’re taking this way too far.

          My original common, which minimally changed to clarify my messups, didn’t have anything to do with surgery’s, talked about my wanting a bigger dick, and stated people should be able tonexpress how they feel just no life altering drugs.

          Even what I added after doesn’t change what inworte. Even though I added them immediately

          • @Dasus
            link
            English
            36 hours ago

            I do know what to tell you.

            You wrote a comment, I read it, replied it to it, and whilst I was replying to it, you started editing it, then I posted my comment and then you posted your edit.

            Nothing weird about it. And still, you don’t say you suffered from moobs, do you? So how is me bringing that up me calling you fat just for pointing out that more cis males have gender affirming care than trans people, statistically? You were wrong to say I was calling you fat, because I wasn’t. But you can’t say “I was mistaken in thinking you called me fat.”

            “It didn’t say anything about surgeries”

            You might as well have been talking about pasta in general and then start crying when I bring up spaghetti, saying “I was talking about pasta, it has nothing to do with spaghetti!” One is a subcategory of the other. “Gender affirming care” includes within it gender affirming surgeries.

            And how exactly would you go about getting a bigger dick without a surgery, pray tell?

              • @Dasus
                link
                English
                45 hours ago

                How far in life do you think you’ll get if you can’t swallow your pride enough to say “I’m sorry, I made a mistake” , online, to a stranger.

                In any sort of business setting you’re gonna have to do that a lot.

                I never called you fat. You said I did. You were wrong. I’d like an apology.

                You were talking about gender affirming care, part of which is gender affirming surgeries, which is why I informed you of the fact that most of those are for cis males. I prefaced it with “FYI”. As in, I was informing you of a thing that’s related, not cooking up personal insults.

                And again, I don’t know how you imagine one could get a bigger penis if not surgically? You haven’t wasted your moneys on those advertisemts in emails promising “inches in weeks”? I don’t think you should. They’re not too trustworthy as companies, I’ve heard.

                  • @Dasus
                    link
                    English
                    45 hours ago

                    Yeah I’m the offensive one for calling you out for saying I’m trying to insult you and then asking for an apology because I showed I didn’t, and now you’re spamming “fucking fuck fuck fuck fucking fuck you you fucking fuck”.

                    Okay I’ll knock down my king and you can tell your friends you won this internet debate.