I know nothing should surprise me with these fucking people at this point, but my mouth still dropped open when I read that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -83 hours ago

    You do remember that this attack happened while Kamala was VP.

    I would feel sick if the candidate I voted for was cheering Israel for massacring thousands of innocent people. May I remind you that the DNC barred the pro-Gaza crowd? May I remind you that Trump and Biden were competing on who is the closest Israeli ally?

    Yep, having Trump as a president sucks, but at least my hands are not filled with blood.

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Did you vote for Kamala? Or did you allow trump to get elected? Guess what, your hands are stained with innocent blood either way. Your hands fill up faster with trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -43 hours ago

        I was not complicit in getting either of them elected. My hands are clean, and so is my conscience.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 minutes ago

          This is prime “enlightened third party voter” meme material right here.

          Must be nice in that ivory tower.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 minutes ago

            And this is prime “You didn’t vote for my shit candidate, therefore you are literally Hitler”.

            It is certainly nice to not have blood on my hands.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 hours ago

          You’re living with the delusion of clean hands and a clean conscious and you only had to sacrifice countless numbers of people to do it.

        • Golden Lox
          link
          English
          43 hours ago

          this is an interesting stance. not a US citizen, but i live in a country where voting is mandatory. i assume you didnt vote?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            There are not just two candidates in the US, although the establishment would prefer everyone to believe that.

            • Golden Lox
              link
              English
              6
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              right but FPTP kinda ensures third party is negligible until it becomes the ‘second party’ right?

              edit: and also, i agree itd not youre fault, not trying to assess blame, just trying to understand the psyche of a (realistically) non-voter

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  44 minutes ago

                  So you acknowledge your part in getting Trump elected, good to know.

                  In a few years maybe you’ll drop this delusion that you didn’t elect Trump by not voting for Harris.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    129 minutes ago

                    My part in getting Trump elected is minuscule to the part the Democratic Party played to get him electable.

        • @conartistpanda
          link
          English
          059 minutes ago

          You were complicit in getting Trump elected the moment you didnt vote for his opponent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            130 minutes ago

            Did he have only one opponent? Last time I checked there were more than two candidates.

        • @T00l_shed
          link
          English
          23 hours ago

          You had a choice to make, either vote for one of them, assuming you’re American and can vote, or be complicit with whomever was elected. You can trick yourself into believing you had no impact on the outcome, but assume what I said earlier was true, you either helped trump get elected, and therefore have blood on your hands, or you voted against trump, and have blood on your hands, but less blood.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            The result would be the same no matter the candidate. Gaza was razed to the ground while the democrats were in power. And not only that, but they actively backed the Israeli government. If we allow ourselves to betray our moral principles, then we are on a downwards spiral where each candidate can say and do whatever they want, as long as the candidate next to them is a tiny bit worse.

            • @T00l_shed
              link
              English
              23 hours ago

              Hence why I said you had blood on your hands no matter what. This is where harm mitigation comes in, by not voting, you agree to whoever is elected, in this case trump who wants to further ethnic cleansing. This was the last election in the US as we know it. And trump isn’t a “tiny bit worse”.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13 hours ago

                Who said anything about not voting? There were not just two candidates last time I checked.

                I agree to whoever gets elected, because that is how democracy works. As far as I am concerned that might be the last election in the US. period. And the Democratic Party is partly to blame.

                • @T00l_shed
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Not voting for the only viable candidate that wasn’t an overt fascist is empowering fascists. The democrats aren’t solely to blame those who allowed a fascist dictator to come into power share the blame

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    02 hours ago

                    “Not voting for the only viable candidate”. So between two shit candidates, we should vote for the one who smells the least like shit. Nope. That’s not how democracy works. Everyone should vote for the candidate that bests represents them. I didn’t say that democrats are solely to blame. I said partly.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0
                    edit-2
                    2 hours ago

                    Not voting for candidate = voting for them.

                    Solid logic.

                    Telling people how they have to vote.

                    Also, solid logic.