I hate people who treat them like some toys and fantasize about them. That makes me think they are in some sort of death cult. That they found socially acceptable way to love violence.

I would still get one for safety but it is a tool made for specifically one thing. To pierce the skin and rip through the inner organs of a person.

They can serve a good purpose but they are fundamentally grim tools of pain and suffering. They shouldn’t be celebrated and glorified in their own right, that is sick. They can be used to preserve something precious but at a price to pay.

  • NSRXN
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -16 hours ago

    Inevitably the false dilemma gets painted between killing them or overpopulation

    it’s not a false dilemma. it’s a real dilemma. and your solution is also to kill them.

    • @dx1
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Taking just the “solution” of reintroducing predators - it’s still not the same. Predation specifically targets old, weak, sick members of a herd. What do hunters do? It’s what, a tag limit and age limit, and that’s it.

      This whole conversation always seems so disingenuous. People doing hunting claim these altruistic motives, but have every adverse incentive that has nothing to do with those motives, from stocking their freezers to just bragging about what they hunted. Let’s be for real here, you’re not scientists or veterinarians carefully monitoring and managing a population, what you’re doing is taking the first justification you can find for what you already wanted to do.

      • NSRXN
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -24 hours ago

        it’s still not the same.

        no, it’s not the same, but your solution is also to kill them. if that happens, and people can benefit above and beyond balancing the ecosystem, that’s even better.

        • @dx1
          link
          English
          24 hours ago

          Uh-huh. So of all the options - just shooting adult deer, or restoring the ecosystem to the way it was, or actual scientific approaches like sterilization, you’re only interested in the one that benefits you, and then you start ignoring the moral implications, and associated risks like humans getting shot. See, the conversation would go smoother if you just declare from the outset that you only care about what benefits you, and we could drop the pretense that this is about what’s actually the best solution.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 hours ago

            the conversation would go smoother if you just declare from the outset that you only care about what benefits you, and we could drop the pretense that this is about what’s actually the best solution.

            being snide is unnecessary. you can apologize.

          • NSRXN
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 hours ago

            you start ignoring the moral implications

            you didn’t raise any moral implications. like what?