Initially I was all but I don’t want to be social. Then I was oh that’s what their talking about. I feel I am social enough though. And all science should be repeated for vapidity.
Initially I was all but I don’t want to be social. Then I was oh that’s what their talking about. I feel I am social enough though. And all science should be repeated for vapidity.
how do you know if a mouse is autistic
See if it watches the same YouTube video over and over
Just like with autistic humans, you flood them with valproic acid while they are gestating.
/s
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/valproic-acid-side-effects.html
Basically, drug manufacturers decided that autism is the same thing as chemically lobotomizing and physically deforming the subject in utero, because chemically lobotomized mice are less social.
I wish I was making this up, but I’m not.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4688329/
Translated: If we give flood mice with valproic acid in utero, they develop brain lesions, which makes them kind of retarded (they literally use mental retardation as a ‘common symptom’ of autism in the paper) and bad at socializing, therefore that’s basically the same as autism.
To apply this directly to humans, when an adult autism diagnosis requires something like a year or two of continuous meeting with a PhD psychologist, is completely bonkers.
Given that the core ‘chemical imbalance’ model that was the theoretical underpinning for the development of SSRIs has been shown to be at best, wildly incorrect, and at worst, totally bunk, I’d say this study is horseshit.
EDIT: When people make showerthoughts style questions like “what is going to be the ‘oops we didn’t know widespread cigarette or leaded gasoline usage was actually horrible for us’ of our time?” … the answer is mass use of manufactured psychoactive drugs.
The actual truth is that their efficacy in treating what they are prescribed to treat is far, far less than is commonly presented by most common people and professionals, that the proposed mechanisms to explain how and why they work are actually quite poorly understood and not backed up by real data (cough, almost all the studies are on psychiatric drugs are conducted or funded by the drug manufacturers themselves, cough), and that the deleterious side effects caused by them are far more common and severe than lay people and professionals believe.
Sounds like this study, and other studies using VPA-induced “ASD” in animal models, are straight up dangerous and could lead to negative consequences for the neurodivergent community due to wrong results.
This is just eugenics by another name.
Equating ASD people to brain damaged lab rats sounds a lot like eugenics, yeah.
Check to see if it likes solving mazes without the reward of cheese at the end. Just the satisfaction of being an autistic little mouse in a maze.
Haven’t you heard about the human autism detectors? Those people who say: “Oh, but you don’t look autistic!”
/s
Rant incoming
I wish I didn’t seem Autistic. You don’t need to bring r/Autism here.
I feel like a bunch of people on Reddit aren’t really Autistic. They just think it is cool to be Autistic and they like to think they are better than the rest of humanity. Chances are they have other related things like ADHD. I hate to go around telling people they aren’t Autistic but it is really not cool to idolize Autism. People on Reddit go around saying things like “ableism” when a lot of us struggle to mask effectively. Maybe you are Autistic but if people can’t tell you are in a much better position than some. Autistic people need to work way harder to succeed in life. We should celebrate success in fitting in to society as long as it doesn’t mean a broken work life balance.
This isn’t Reddit. Please stop with the fucking “/s” bullshit.
Hey I mean, I am 99% on the side of ‘/s is way, way too overused’, but, much like with cursing or other kinds of emphasis and tone indicative formatting, there are cases where it makes sense to use, and be used sparingly.
We’re in an autism community.
This is the most likely place you’re going to get people interpreting possibly sarcastic statements literally, with no verbal intonation to go off of.
With the statement you are criticizing for using the /s mark… that could very easily just be interpreted by people, especially autistic people, as completely serious, unironic, and not sarcastic…
…because many people, again, especially autistic people, have heard people say basically exactly that statement entirely seriously and honestly.
EDIT: Ironically, you being crude and dismissive while tone policing is arguably even more ‘reddit bullshit’ than using /s in an autism community, which almost certainly has more interaction from autistic people, who are well known to take things completely literally more often than others.
Thank you. I’m glad you see it the way I did.
=D
EDIT: wow, ok.
HawtTism appears to be a common troll.
Account created about 2 months ago, basically every single comment they’ve made recently is massively downvoted or has been deleted by a moderator… or both.
Thank god lemmy has a block feature.
Observe it at mouse parties