• @DragonsInARoom
    link
    161 day ago

    You cannot choose what the world throws at you so the acceptable amount is the amount that doesn’t cause a problem

      • @DragonsInARoom
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Then you either don’t know enough about the subject to do anything about it, or it doesn’t matter

        • @ClinicallydepressedpoochieOP
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That’s not true at all. You need data to tell you the long term effects. You don’t need that same data develop ways to regulate it and remove it.

          • @DragonsInARoom
            link
            71 day ago

            You do need data to see the long term negative effects. People won’t regulate it and remove it if its not having a negative effect. So we need that data to make an informed move on what to do next.

              • @DragonsInARoom
                link
                41 day ago

                Either the studies will tell us how much, or until we feel the negative effects from the dosage of plastics.

                • @ClinicallydepressedpoochieOP
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  We don’t know how clear it will be before there are negative effects. It could be alarming amounts. Ever see a smokers lung?

                  • @DragonsInARoom
                    link
                    31 day ago

                    If there are negative reports reportedly caused from microplastics there will be resources looking into the subject matter. Studies that look at the long term effects will take time, but there might be some shorter length studies comparing different plastics and their effects at poisonous dosages. I know that companies claim that their products are “BPA Free” maybe that’s a good starting point for your research. (I don’t know the reason why everything is BPA free, but it must’ve been big enough to leave a digital footprint.)