You might think using a chatbot to think for you just makes you dumber — or that chatbots are especially favored by people who never liked thinking in the first place. It turns out the bot users re…
I have read the paper, how about not immediately jumping to the condescending, patronizing tone?
Also, you didn’t answer the question. It simply says “users with access to GenAI tools”. You’ve added your own qualifications separate from the question at hand.
why don’t you look at the paper then and find out
you should be so lucky
this isn’t those people
I have read the paper, how about not immediately jumping to the condescending, patronizing tone?
Also, you didn’t answer the question. It simply says “users with access to GenAI tools”. You’ve added your own qualifications separate from the question at hand.
how about you go fuck yourself
is everything. including summarizing research since it’s pretty fucking obvious you didn’t read shit. now fuck off
also, holy fuck their post history is essentially nothing but unsubtle dogwhistles and pro-AI garbage
lol the nazi sees nothing wrong with LLMs of course
…I did it again. I looked.
oof.
The condescension and patronisation is well deserved. Your question is answered in the fucking title of the paper.
If you’d ever engaged in critical thinking, then maybe we could have avoided this exercise.