ID: From a Comrade posted:
"In the coming year, things will pop off. When they do, someone will volunteer to do security. They will possibly show up with a lot of battle rattle and a take-charge, can-do attitude.
Do not let them do security. Ask them to read some bell hooks. Ask them how many women they know trust them. Ask them to do some reproductive labor first, like working in a kitchen. Talk to them in depth about political theory. Understand their motivations and their relationship to violence and power.
Over half of people who want to do security, are people who should never do security. The biggest red flag for weeding out bad security people, is that they are eager to do security."
It’s pretty obvious the point is to get an idea of what they think they are securing, and also their personal philosophy on things.
A personal philosophy is a fine and dandy thing to have - but it’s not much of a security measure to protect against the very thing OP says they are concerned about, is it now?
What? No it absolutely is.
People that could be viewed as an authority figure, and would “take charge”, absolutely have to have a personal philosophy of advocating for equity.
Are they there out of concern, or for their ego? You need to uncover that, and not let them go unchecked while you figure that out.