• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 day ago

      If you want a socially liberal party then being a part of a group that looks to mock and belittle minorities should be unacceptable.

      Having a high profile token sacrifice, and seeing how much demand for blood remains is not a socially liberal policy.

      • *Tagger*
        link
        21 day ago

        Okay, I see your point, but they are still investigating. Give them a bit of a chance

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          I guess if this were reversed, so if this was an anti-labour unions group, and if a senior member was suspended for talking about wanting the Union to collapse then people would be up in arms that they are allowing any anti-union group to live inside Labour. But you’d be okay with that as long as they said they were investigating?

          Sorry, but as far as I’m concerned being part of that group earns a suspension with a review, not the other way around.

          • *Tagger*
            link
            116 hours ago

            Isn’t it just an edgy humour group that has gone too fast? A lso, you can be assessed to WhatsApp groups without your approval.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              114 hours ago

              Hence why i would talk about suspending while investigating not immediate dismissal.

              Its all about priorities. If they are a liberal party moreso than a Union party then they would want to avoid even the appearance of being anti-socially liberal. Because they don’t it shows that they really don’t care about their appearance of being a liberal party and it’s just a side hussle to keep the edge quiet. It would be dropped if it interfered with their main objectives (whatever they are).