• lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I have to ask, you do understand that people aren’t likely to ditch their entire DE setup and go buy another graphics card, which both work perfectly well with everything except Wayland… just for the privilege of using Wayland?

      It would have to offer some outstanding feature to compel people to do this. But it offers nothing and is proud of it. I don’t get it.

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m a FOSS contributor myself and I know what it means to volunteer time and resources for the community. But the software needs to meet users in the middle.

          The FOSS and Linux software scene is a meritocracy. Software rises to the top if it’s truly useful and “Don’t use it” in my experience is code-speak for “this software is a solution looking for a problem”.

          The Nvidia hurdle in particular is insurmountable. They haven’t wavered in their stance on closed drivers in the last 20 years, they have no incentive to care about the Linux desktop, and yet they have 80% of this niche according to Steam. If Wayland intends to die on this hill it can order a headstone right now and save time.

            • lemmyvore
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If Wayland wants to be a hobby piece of software that scratches an itch for a couple of people, you’re perfectly correct.

              If it wants to displace Xorg, one of the most widely used pieces of software in the community, it’s going to have to cater to the users’ needs. And I do mean needs; a working DE is not a whim.

              They can’t act like the former and claim the latter. It just doesn’t work that way. What good is Wayland if it won’t work for the majority of people and will eventually languish in obscurity?