@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 hours agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1182arrow-down12
arrow-up1180arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 hours agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-square@sober_monklinkEnglish14•8 hours agoThanks for the link, interesting read! I know that a good paper is succint, but honestly, I thought that making the case for a gigaton-yield nuclear explosion to combat climate change would take more than four pages…
Thanks for the link, interesting read! I know that a good paper is succint, but honestly, I thought that making the case for a gigaton-yield nuclear explosion to combat climate change would take more than four pages…