• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This has got to be wrong. A human head, projected like a world map, would show both eyes and both ears, except in the case of showing only one half (like when you only show/photograph the Americas).

    This appears to take a picture of the side of the head (i.e. that particular projection, showing less than half of the full globe), then distort it as if it were already a different projection.

    Edit: worse than that. The globe onto which the half-head-image is superimposed in the top right is larger than the head. Like if you took a photo of the Americas half of the world from space, pasted that onto a larger beach ball, then stretched the result to demonstrate the projections.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        Taking a second look at that, though - is that really a continuous projection? Or is that storing different parts as different chunks (and maybe projected differently) put together into the one image?

        • I Cast Fist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Some parts are continuous projections, like the face and torso, which are “closed” geometric objects. I don’t know exactly how the HL human mesh is, whether separated in different chunks or fully joined in a single 3D object, but either would work if the faces are properly pointed to the specific pixel regions

    • Flying SquidOP
      link
      16 hours ago

      Possibly. I asked (and no one’s answered yet, so I still don’t know) if it’s still a Mercator projection if you vertically bisect a map of the Earth.

      • Malle_Yeno
        link
        fedilink
        22 hours ago

        Yes. Why wouldn’t it be?

        Projections don’t have to be limited to the entire earth. You can subset the area represented and still apply a projection. (Though you do have a decision if you’re taking an arc-area to “re-align” your projecting shape so that it best fits your area. But that might be more complicated than you’re looking for, other projections best suited for your locale would be a better fit)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        56 hours ago

        It’s still a Mercator projection if you take any part of a map projected thusly. (And there’s the “modified universal transverse Mercator” that, I think, is that with some grid offset.)

        But, see my edit, this image isn’t doing that. It’s stretching a “picture of half a face superimposed on a larger half globe,” not the half-face as if the head were the globe.