No one said NATO style. You said no one in the West pledged protection, the US did. The only thing arguable about it is how much protection was stated. The US backtracked and now say it simply means they will recognize Ukrainian borders and border incursions into Ukraine based on the meaning of three different words in 4 languages that all basically mean the same thing.
Did Western countries promise them security? That’s the whole controversy about them joining NATO.
As you’re clearly aware America which is western pledged security, what exactly that means is debatable but the fact it happened is not.
Ed: I linked it to you already dipshit, and that isn’t an answer to a question nor an argument. That’s saying I’m too dumb to understand your point and yet that actually means you’re too goddamn stupid to get your point across.
I can link it to you, but I can’t understand it for you. The section about what Russia said about the memorandum when they invaded Crimea was pretty interesting too, and new to me.
No one said NATO style. You said no one in the West pledged protection, the US did. The only thing arguable about it is how much protection was stated. The US backtracked and now say it simply means they will recognize Ukrainian borders and border incursions into Ukraine based on the meaning of three different words in 4 languages that all basically mean the same thing.
As you’re clearly aware America which is western pledged security, what exactly that means is debatable but the fact it happened is not.
Ed: I linked it to you already dipshit, and that isn’t an answer to a question nor an argument. That’s saying I’m too dumb to understand your point and yet that actually means you’re too goddamn stupid to get your point across.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
I can link it to you, but I can’t understand it for you. The section about what Russia said about the memorandum when they invaded Crimea was pretty interesting too, and new to me.