Again under Bavarian jurisdiction by a refused, but failed to detain asylum seeker. It it not a problem of missing laws, it is a failure to execute existing laws.
EDIT: OK, the official sources corrected the status of the driver from “illegal refugee” to “legal asylum seeker”. Still, this action feeds votes into the rightwing corners.
According to more recent insights that is not the case. The driver ha a work permit and has not been known for any crimes. He was the witness in a crime which is why he was known to police.
Again under Bavarian jurisdiction by a refused, but failed to detain asylum seeker. It it not a problem of missing laws, it is a failure to execute existing laws.
EDIT: OK, the official sources corrected the status of the driver from “illegal refugee” to “legal asylum seeker”. Still, this action feeds votes into the rightwing corners.
According to more recent insights that is not the case. The driver ha a work permit and has not been known for any crimes. He was the witness in a crime which is why he was known to police.
Yep, that is the state of information now. When I wrote my post, the official information was different.
It showed that your post was 7 minutes old when I posted. The information was available earlier.
But it proves the point I wanted to make. Big claims need to be verified diligently.