I love how an article discussing lower amounts of people pursuing higher education has spelling mistakes on its subtitle…
As someone getting a PhD I 100% think the stipend if you have one and life stagnation are 100% reasons not to get one. I often tell students who ask me if they should explore religious studies grad school that they should pursue a job in their stem field and study religion on their own time, so they get paid.
I’ve worked in academics and it just all seems miserable and only about the money and beuracracy.
I was putting together a research paper and a friend of mine whose a professor was telling me to try to monetize it rather than publish. Meanwhile I just wanted to see how things work and share it out.
I love how an article discussing lower amounts of people pursuing higher education has spelling mistakes on its subtitle…
As someone getting a PhD I 100% think the stipend if you have one and life stagnation are 100% reasons not to get one. I often tell students who ask me if they should explore religious studies grad school that they should pursue a job in their stem field and study religion on their own time, so they get paid.
I’ve worked in academics and it just all seems miserable and only about the money and beuracracy.
I was putting together a research paper and a friend of mine whose a professor was telling me to try to monetize it rather than publish. Meanwhile I just wanted to see how things work and share it out.
So… “whose” is possessive and “who’s” is the contraction you’re looking for. 🤣 “Spelling error” much, doc? Better watch out. 😂🖖🏼
Edit: ohgod. The “bureaucracy” carnage was too much for my brain to parse in a glance — I must’ve repressed it until this second look. 🥲
In what way?
Was it stem?
Never heard of that! I agree the bureaucracy can be horrible but there isn’t much money to be had lol.
deleted by creator