I’m required to click in order to find out any of the measures since they’re not in the title of the video or in the post description. Before watching, I have no idea whether they’ll be snake oil.
5 minute is a long time. The effort I am willing to put into listening is proportional to the amount of care the creator took when editing to respecting the listener’s time.
If someone approaches me in a way that signals they obviously and blatantly do not value my time, why would I give them any of it?
I’m required to click in order to find out any of the measures since they’re not in the title of the video or in the post description. Before watching, I have no idea whether they’ll be snake oil.
Clickbait implies a misleading, or incorrect title.
If you want a written resource, I’m sure you can find one.
I’ve curated what I put in the interesting area to be things I found interesting of high value.
Okay, I was a bit harsh, and “clickbait” is inaccurate. I’m sorry.
Still seems like the measures could be revealed in the title or post description.
5:13 he gives the TL;DR - metabolic health. It wasn’t even that far into the video my guy.
Proposed new video title:
“How metabolic health can be measured at home to Predict a Heart Attack - Dr. Brewer”
That would be sufficient to know if the video is worth a click.
5 minute is a long time. The effort I am willing to put into listening is proportional to the amount of care the creator took when editing to respecting the listener’s time.
If someone approaches me in a way that signals they obviously and blatantly do not value my time, why would I give them any of it?