• @kadu
    link
    English
    82 years ago

    There is a federated version of YouTube…

    But storing video is a massive challenge, way harder than dealing with a Lemmy or Mastodon instance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      My rational mind realises it’s such an expensive system to run that it’s reasonable for them to charge or show ads. The problem is they’ve been extremely aggressive with ads and pushing subscriptions, to the point where I’m pretty resentful of the idea. Plus they’ve neglected so many things (like allowing aggressive copyright predators and refusing to implement sensible human-based appeals processes) that they really should have dealt with and instead embraced an algorithm that I’m pretty sure is at least partially responsible for the radicalisation of large groups of people.

      I… don’t mind paying for shit. I just don’t want to give them money.

      Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

      • @vividspecter
        link
        English
        52 years ago

        Also: wow there’s federated video sharing? Bet that’s not cheap to run.

        It’s called PeerTube for the record.

      • @NatureLover
        link
        English
        22 years ago

        I’ve been paying for YouTube since it was YouTube Red. Then they increased the price of the family plan by 50% and I quit paying. Adblocking has been working well. This news about YT blocking adblocking came out a few weeks ago and since then I have been watching and listening via YT non-stop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      The federated version also breaks one of YouTube’s bigger strengths: Just browsing for something interesting.