• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 days ago

      And they were both telling the unvarnished truth for once. Billionaire-owned media aren’t reliable sources for news.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        95 days ago

        Absolutely. It all started with Ted Turner and CNN. He very obviously viewed news as entertainment. Every story, no matter how small, was announced as Breaking News.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is a bit of the classic “both sides being the same” argument. The first article you linked even calls it out.

      In the Fox case, Carlson was presenting his own narrative, not even one extrapolating from known facts.

      Maddow was like “hey this journalist is working for Putin and writing for OAN. OAN is Russian propaganda.” When in reality, the journalist in question wrote for Sputnik News, which is affiliated with the Russian government. Granted it is a bit of a stretch to say all of OAN is Russian propaganda.

      Carlson, on the other hand, just completely made up a story about Karen McDougal blackmailing Trump. A completely made up story.

      So yeah, I wouldn’t go saying both sides are the same here.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        English
        15 days ago

        There is no “both sides” in for-profit news media. There’s only corporations figuring out which the most profitable demographic for them is.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      15 days ago

      Yep, it’s not Fox in general, that was only about Tucker’s show.