@theyoyomaster to News • 1 year agoGun control laws in California and beyond in peril as Supreme Court expands 2nd Amendmentwww.latimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square58arrow-up186arrow-down15
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkGun control laws in California and beyond in peril as Supreme Court expands 2nd Amendmentwww.latimes.com@theyoyomaster to News • 1 year agomessage-square58
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•1 year agoI expect nothing less from this corrupt court.
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglink6•1 year agoJust because they don’t rule the way you’d like, doesn’t make them corrupt. What’s the cases they’ve ruled on that show you their corruption?
minus-squareDave Heidtlinkfedilink1•1 year ago@MasterObee @MyOpinion Citizens United is but one example. The shadow docket is another.
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglink1•1 year agoCitizens united is a good example. Where do you think they got their law wrong?
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglink3•1 year agoYeah, they interpret it. You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
minus-squareMasterOBee Master/Kinglink1•1 year agoI don’t find your argument convincing if you can’t find any ‘corrupt’ court cases then.
minus-squareDave Heidtlinkfedilink0•1 year ago@MasterObee You’re an agent provocateur. No need to convince you. You don’t hold your own opinion on anything.
I expect nothing less from this corrupt court.
Just because they don’t rule the way you’d like, doesn’t make them corrupt.
What’s the cases they’ve ruled on that show you their corruption?
@MasterObee @MyOpinion Citizens United is but one example. The shadow docket is another.
Citizens united is a good example. Where do you think they got their law wrong?
@MasterObee Trick question. Courts don’t write laws.
Yeah, they interpret it.
You said they got it wrong and it was a corrupt ruling. I’m curious where you think the law went against what they ruled, in other words, how did they interpret the law ‘corruptly’
@MasterObee No.
I don’t find your argument convincing if you can’t find any ‘corrupt’ court cases then.
@MasterObee You’re an agent provocateur. No need to convince you. You don’t hold your own opinion on anything.