- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/22688165
Random thought on magic squares:
If I view the smallest possible non-trivial magic square
2 7 6 9 5 1 4 3 8
since its rows and diagnoals sum up to
2+5+8 = 2+7+6 = 4+5+6 = 2+9+4 = … = 15
Lets view it as a 3x3 Matrix, its determinant is Δ = -360 . Its inverse:
-37/360 19/180 23/360 17/90 1/45 -13/90 -7/360 -11/180 53/360
note how this is a magic square, rows and diagonals sum up to
1/15
.https://matrix.reshish.com/inverse.php
Now if you are really bored (I can not do this): proof that for any non trivial magic squares the inverse …
- exists (i.e. every non-trivial magic square has an inverse)
- is a magic square.
this is actually interesting, im currently on bed so im not writing a proof, but the rule for a 3x3 magic square of conseqetive numbers seemed to be (tested on one other example) that its inverse is 1/(3*middle number), the 3 could be the dimension of the square?
if this is true, this begs the questions:
either way im gonna have a go at it when i wake up tmr, and im pinning this for being one of the coolests finds in the community