- cross-posted to:
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- politics
Rattled by a horde of MAGA trolls, here’s what I learned about today’s social media miasma.
Last Friday I made a post on Bluesky and X, concerning U.S. President Donald Trump’s description of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as “Governor.” It occurred to me that, numb as we are to Trump’s stream of blather, the importance of that remark was being overlooked. It was an overt declaration by the president of the United States that he does not recognize Canadian sovereignty. That’s scary.
So, my post: “For a US president to refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as ‘Governor’ isn’t just rude. It’s a hostile act.”
The post got little attention on Bluesky. On X, for whatever reason, it went berserk. Over the weekend it racked up close to 3,000 reposts, over 29,000 “likes” and more than 5,000 replies. Those replies came almost entirely from Trump-loving trolls, piling scorn and abuse on my concerns. “Yeah but it’s Canada so who gives a fuck?” said one.
Do the responses represent a genuine glimpse of U.S. opinion on Trump’s bully-boy act?
They all do.
Ok so nothing is genuine? That’s your take?
Sounds like a reasonable conclusion.
That’s the opposite or “reasonable” lol
I don’t see what’s unreasonable about saying that you shouldn’t take the things you read on algorithmic social media sites as representative of any population at large. That it’s not a “genuine” representation of any population.
Every social media is “algorithmic”. So, yes, it’s unreasonable to say you should take nothing you read anywhere as representative.
That… doesn’t make any sense.
Every rabid beast is “dangerous”. So, yes, it’s unreasonable to say you should assume that if you run into one it will attack you.
That’s what you sound like.
What a shitty analogy
How is it different? You’re basically saying that all social media is untrustworthy and so therefore it’s ridiculous to not trust any of it. There’s no logic there.