I checked to make sure. I remembered Dio as more hostile than he was, though he certainly has some condemnation, he’s on the whole pro-Caesar, while I remembered him as more negative. Suetonius relates positive and negative stories about him, but regards his assassination as just. Plutarch is more in-line with what I was thinking.
I would’ve sworn to passages in one of Tacitus’s works heavily critical on Caesar, but if they exist, Google is too fucked to give quick access, and I don’t have the energy to paw through all of Tacitus’s works to find a few paragraphs that probably aren’t even the focus of the chapter.
Maybe I’m thinking of letters rather than histories?
No worries. I’ve probably got the autobiography more in my mind anyway, and current events have probably biased me on the side of presuming propaganda. 😂
Still perfectly plausible either way, that ol’ Ivlivs handed the letter over as a pure flex or as CYA and a flex.
I checked to make sure. I remembered Dio as more hostile than he was, though he certainly has some condemnation, he’s on the whole pro-Caesar, while I remembered him as more negative. Suetonius relates positive and negative stories about him, but regards his assassination as just. Plutarch is more in-line with what I was thinking.
I would’ve sworn to passages in one of Tacitus’s works heavily critical on Caesar, but if they exist, Google is too fucked to give quick access, and I don’t have the energy to paw through all of Tacitus’s works to find a few paragraphs that probably aren’t even the focus of the chapter.
Maybe I’m thinking of letters rather than histories?
No worries. I’ve probably got the autobiography more in my mind anyway, and current events have probably biased me on the side of presuming propaganda. 😂
Still perfectly plausible either way, that ol’ Ivlivs handed the letter over as a pure flex or as CYA and a flex.