I did not realize they were trying to compete in the first place.

  • @Voyajer
    link
    English
    232 days ago

    …Breaking steam up would make it worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -132 days ago

      How? If any feature is necessary then it will be filled by someone else

      You aren’t losing anything

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 days ago

        Apart from all the non-profitable features divorced from meaning.

        The forums would go in the blink of an eye.

        And then each section would try to make itself complete in itself to hoard user time, and at least one would start selling advertising space.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Negatively.

            In money for servers as well as time. And that’s for something with far less users than Steam.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 hours ago

              That’s the point

              It’s done because you want to do it not to make money

              Maybe you have 10-20 forums installed into your client to cover the games you play

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 hours ago

                So when you said “break up Steam” you didn’t mean it in the usual, anti-monopoly sense where bits of a company are spun out into independent entities or sold off?

                You meant let everything be done by enthusiasts and have it kinda interoperable?

                I’m not against that, but I think there are bigger dragons of capitalism to slay first before we hope that splitting forums off of Steam doesn’t send them the way of the IMDB forums.