• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Although, today we feel USB 2.0 is pretty slow, it is literally “Hi-Speed”, USB 3.x would be “SuperSpeed”.

    As thir connectors arent glued or molded to the cable, they can be replaced without damaging the cable by using a soldering iron. For a cheap USB cable, you would need to cut off the connector, remove the isolation and the solder a new connector to it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      But why would I buy an expensive USB cable in 2025? They collect like lint in my drawers…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s another a different question. Not needing to buy a cable because you’ve already got one is one aspect of sustainability. However, in future, more people will have to buy cables (and chargers) as the will no longer be bundled with new smartphones.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          And no one should be buying slow cables that they’re likely to trash anyway once they figure out their limitations…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 days ago

            I have no idea why they only fulfill the USB 2.0 specification and not 3.x either, except using them for file transfer being a more rare use case than charging.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 days ago

              I have no doubt it’s because of the cost.

              You can get these connectors for less than 1€.
              If you order directly from China I’m sure they’ll be even cheaper.