The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent term ended with a flurry of conservative-leaning decisions that have been met with shock and disapproval, particularly from the left. This conservative trend is seen as a reflection of the 6-3 conservative majority established during Trump’s presidency. Noteworthy rulings include siding with a web designer who refused services to same-sex couples, ending affirmative action in colleges, and dismissing President Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan.

  • MasterOBee Master/King
    link
    -11 year ago

    I think I’m alright. I’m not going to waste my time on you any further.

    I know, hard to make an argument when you just make wild claims.

    Why say anything if you’re just gonna misrepresent what I’ve said?

    That’s what you said, like 2nd comment of our conversation.

    • @S_Roman
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know, hard to make an argument when you just make wild claims.

      No, it’s just hard to talk with people who do not do so in good faith.

      • MasterOBee Master/King
        link
        -21 year ago

        I asked you to support your claim that the reason why supreme court cases are being rule dhow they are is because they are in rich folks pockets.

        You really couldn’t, so I don’t see why there would be a point to continue this convo.

        • @S_Roman
          link
          11 year ago

          You really couldn’t

          You can lead a horse to water…

          • MasterOBee Master/King
            link
            01 year ago

            It takes a lot of logical leaps to go from ‘someone paid for his vacation’ to say 'they’re just ruling with whatever rich person is sending them money! I can’t point to any specific people…or cases they ruled on, BUT THEY ARE!!"

            • @S_Roman
              link
              11 year ago

              I can’t explain something to somebody who doesn’t want to listen to the explanation.

              • MasterOBee Master/King
                link
                01 year ago

                You can’t explain anything because you can’t prove what you need to about your statement. You made a statement, but you failed to prove any part of it. I’ve read every single word you’ve wrote and gone to each of your sources.

                Show me how money has altered any of the sitting current justices opinions.

                • @S_Roman
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  I’ve read every single word you’ve wrote and gone to each of your sources.

                  Reading something doesn’t mean anything if you don’t understand it.

                  Show me how money has altered any of the sitting current justices opinions.

                  See above and actually read in good faith.

                  • MasterOBee Master/King
                    link
                    01 year ago

                    Reading something doesn’t mean anything if you don’t understand it.

                    Hahaha, come back with an actual argument, instead of some loose ‘see he went on a paid vacation, therefore he just gets paid to rule court cases for rich people.’

                    You made the claim, I asked which case you thought that they ruled on based on corruption, and what their flawed legal reasoning was.

                    You can’t back anything up that you’ve said. If you want to be convincing, you gotta back up your claims.