The costly storage isn’t worth it, apparently.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 days ago

    They have every obligation to their subscribers. Streamers are professional beggars, suggesting that they have no obligation to their viewers/subs is kind of ridiculous.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 days ago

      They literally don’t. You are not buying the person, that is ridiculous. If you feel inclined (you’re not to), you can send money because you enjoyed the stream or whatever. Throwing money at them did not create an obligation on their part. That’s entitlement.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        023 hours ago

        What exactly do you think the business model of streamers are? We’re not talking about Joe playing baldurs gate with his 15 subscribers. We’re talking about Rihanna showing up 4 hours late, drunk as fuck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -12 days ago

          Then why are you debating? You’re wrong and entitled. Frankly, it’s a bit disgusting to think you have purchased a person for $5 or any amount.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 days ago

            No, that’s a ridiculous assertion. What you’re saying is that streamers just get money simply for existing, are you serious?

            The streamer is the content, if you don’t like that - stop watching live streams/streaming.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 days ago

              I’m not the one whining about “professional beggars.” 🤣

              Unless specifically noted, you haven’t bought anything by sending money. It is essentially a tip showing gratitude for the content.

              If you don’t like it, then stop sending money or even watching. It’s really simple stuff.