Have had a few pet projects in the past around RSS aggregation/news reading, which could fact-check the sources/article while reading, also determining the biases from the grammar and linguistic patterns used by the journalist for the article. Same could be applied to comments.

Wonder if such a feature had value for a reader app for Lemmy? I feel a definitive score is toxic. But, if it were to simply display the variables to look out for it can help make a objective decision yourself?

Another application of this, is also pulling just the objective statements in the articles for faster reading.

Edit: More explained in this comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/1524807

    • pexavcOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I said I don’t… And I said it’s not to find it, but to essentially provide the reader with the data points to do so on their own. Like I said in the OP: I feel a definitive score is toxic. But, if it were to simply display the variables to look out for it can help make a objective decision yourself

        • pexavcOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sure, I will. But, I will wait for more perspectives before I move onto the next. It would be a major mistake to continue on this alone. the idea is to have a team to compensate for flaws that you are potentially observing.

    • pexavcOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anyways, I’d like to say we are kind of agreeing. Not sure what caused that aggression. I do think of things in a product sense, but that is the byproduct (no pun intended) of my learning environment. If we are talking about philosophy, I should definitely read up some more. But, the capital T truth understandings majorly came from my observations of David Foster Wallace’s book “This is Water”. I will expand on it and circle back to improve my writing so it communicates my thoughts better.

        • pexavcOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Figure out what the truth is for you and leave that shit alone.

          This actually got me thinking quite a bit and was hoping you’d expand on it. Is it more directed to building things that are not driven by a personal truth?

            • pexavcOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah, it’s more of a reflection rather than a solution

                • pexavcOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Slowly removing passion. Its interesting seeing how things I would feel would increase passion (simply because it creates/saves more time), may have the complete opposite effect and thus going against the whole intention. I ignore this side a lot of the time.

        • pexavcOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I may have misinterpreted the tones then, likewise