Perpetrators of “revenge porn” offences are being allowed to keep explicit images of their victims on their devices, after a failure by prosecutors to obtain orders requiring their deletion.

An Observer analysis of court records in intimate image abuse cases has found that orders for the offenders to give up their devices and delete photos and videos are rarely being made. Of 98 cases concluded in the magistrates courts in England and Wales in the past six months, just three resulted in a deprivation order.

In other cases involving digital devices, such as offences regarding indecent images of children, these orders were made consistently.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) this weekend said more must be done to “stop ­perpetrators retaining these images and continuing to take gratification from their crimes”.

  • LostXOR
    link
    fedilink
    1820 hours ago

    Obviously always issuing deletion orders would be a good thing, but it doesn’t seem like it would be very effective. It would be all too easy for the offender to stash a backup flash drive somewhere before “complying” with the order.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 hours ago

      Also, while it seems such an order is legal - should it be?

      If these were legally obtained photos, why should someone be compelled to delete them? Compelled deletion is a slippery slope. Shared a legally purchased mp3 with a friend? Delete it. Shared a picture of Beyonce at the Superbowl? Delete it.

      • @Madison420
        link
        English
        23 hours ago

        It’s not legal in itself no. Possessing photos or video given to you is not illegal, distributing them is however illegal. Once you get caught and convicted of distributing them things can get a bit grey and no one has really pushed the limit too much to find it’s outer extremes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          Why would distribution be illegal if everyone is of legal age? Not saying it’s a good thing to abuse the trust of someone like that— but unless they had you sign an NDA as soon as you send something to someone over the internet you should assume you’ve given up control over it just practically.

          • @Madison420
            link
            English
            32 hours ago

            Revenge porn statutes they’re often intent based but still.