• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Could it be that after milking that sorry Marvel franchise for all it was worth for years, Disney fails to excite people with their nth ultra-samey, ultra-low-originality rehash?

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2210 hours ago

      They’re just not willing to take the risks they were talking when marvel was still going solo before it’s Disney acquisition. Disney isn’t big on risks.

      • @kameecoding
        link
        English
        47 hours ago

        What risks did they use to take? As long as I remember the Marvel movies have been formulaic copies

        • @keyez
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Giving creative control to specific directors to let their vision shine through the project: Iron Man, Guardians of the Galaxy, Thor Love and Thunder, etc.

          Edit meant Thor Ragnarok the Taika Waititi directed movie.

          • @kameecoding
            link
            English
            35 hours ago

            I mean, Iron man was like literally the first movie in the MCU (discounting that Hulk movie), it also literally started the trope of Bad Guy has literally the same skillset/power as the good guy that was replicated a bunch of times.

            GotG, and Thor: Ragnarok are the only movies that are unique and carried by their directors.

            Love and thunder is a dumpster fire.

            • @keyez
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Ah I think Thor Ragnarok was what I meant, the Taika Waititi directed movie

      • @reddig33
        link
        English
        59 hours ago

        Some of the TV shows have been more creative. The current movies are just rehashes though.