• Alphane MoonOPM
    link
    15
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I was willing to overlook:

    • The bed costs $2,000

    • It won’t function if the internet goes down

    • Basic features are behind an additional $19/mo subscription

    • The bed’s only controls are via mobile app

    You have to be crazy to pay for a product like this. You don’t need to be a security researcher to make an educated guess that the company behind this “bed” is going to spy on you.

    Eight Sleep is clearly onto something, having raised $110 million dollars in venture capital, exceeding $300 million dollars in annual revenue.

    I would have never thought this Eight Sleep outfit had hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue.

    • @jj4211
      link
      02 hours ago

      Ultimately I lost this argument and I will say their pad is better designed than their competition. I love the concept of pairing that pad which is good and harmless by itself with a different temperature controller. I kind of hoped for an alternate firmware for this device, since the hardware of the temperature controller is also well done apart from lack of buttons/remote controller.

      • Alphane MoonOPM
        link
        22 hours ago

        That’s fair. I guess for me personally a “smart” bed that’s also tied to mandatory subscription is an outlandish concept.

        • @jj4211
          link
          11 hour ago

          Yeah, it was rough for me since I advocated for other options that weren’t this way, but had to admit that the engineering on the eight sleep just got to a better physical experience.

          FreeSleep looks promising. Currently grandfathered into the pre-subscription required reality, but fully expect that to evaporate and then it’s off to do the FreeSleep stuff. I anticipate a local control loop will be so much better, and maybe be able to create tactile controls in a wifi based remote control.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I just looked at their Privacy Policy/ToS.

      EDIT: Accidentally hit post.

      Anyway, based on their terms, the customer data is definitely the actual product. In addition, the wording makes it seem likely that the de-identification is pretty weak.

      Further details that should give anyone pause.

      Admitting to not respecting “Do Not Track” signals, because they are not legally required to:

      Mention of collecting data about gender at birth, whether one regularly sleeps with a partner, and menstrual cycle regularity:

      These guys are creepy as fuck, without even getting to the possible backdoor. They are selling customer data with a contractual pinky-swear to not re-identify the data (this being mentioned, to me, means that there is a plausible means to do so). So.

      What kind of creepiness could this data be used for?

      • Potential for blackmail/kompromat. (using sensors to detect patterns of sexual activity that could be infidelity or “sexual deviancy”)

      • Targeting people who may have had abortions.

      • Signs of not following religious doctrine (premarital sex, sex for purpose other than procreation, etc)

      • Checking whether the person is home and likely sleeping.

      • Spying on employees during their off-work hours (not that it’s ok during work hours) and/or scrutinizing sick leave.

      There are a lot more possibilities. Way too dystopian and creepy.

      • Alphane MoonOPM
        link
        36 hours ago

        Trash company with a trash CEO. Until we start treating digital privacy on the same level as physical privacy, this sort of stuff will continue.