• @SchmidtGenetics
    link
    English
    -816 hours ago

    Then you better give up spellcheck and autocorrect.

    • @finitebanjo
      link
      English
      210 hours ago

      LLMs shouldn’t be used for spellcheck that would just be a massive waste of power.

      • @SchmidtGenetics
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        What do you think grammarly is dude? Glorified spell and auto check, which people already utilize everyday. But of course new tools are looked down upon, the hypocrisy of people is amazing to see. It comes in cycles, people hated spell check, got used to it and now it’s prominent in every life, autocorrect, same thing is happening.

        And now the same is happening again. If they want to claim no ai, no spellcheck, no auto correct, and no grammarly for emails. Everyone already uses “AI” everyday. But theirs is acceptable… okay…

        • @finitebanjo
          link
          English
          29 hours ago

          Right but to detect close-enough spellings and word orders, using a curated index or catalogue of accepted examples, is one thing.

          To train layers of algorithms in layers of machines on massive datasets to come up with close enoughs would be that but many times over the costs.

          You would be a moron to use llms for spellchecking.

          To clarify to you, not all programs are equal. Its not all different methods to do the same thing at the same cost.

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -313 hours ago

      That’s not art, that’s a tool. Tools can be made better through a confident statistics box.