• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1214 hours ago

    Very strong “I’m not racist, I have a black friend” vibes from this article. One actress 50 years ago is hardly progress.

    Rather than trying to redeem/rewrite 007, why not spin off a new character instead. Might take some effort and skilled writing, but Amazon have money right?

    • themeatbridge
      link
      1013 hours ago

      Not to mention all the actual racism, misogyny, and the rape.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        712 hours ago

        I appreciate the Bond series as legend, but my partner and I couldn’t face any more movies portraying the same icky encounters as in the first Casino Royale. We just felt incredibly uncomfortable for the woman being taken advantage of by Bond.

        We loved the Daniel Craig films, though. Suitably modern.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 hours ago

          The first Casino Royale is a parody starring David Niven. As I recall they specifically call that out to some extent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      713 hours ago

      And calling her a “Bond girl” is a bit of a stretch. Great that she was included but she’s not quite on the level of Melina Havelock or Countess Lisl von Schlaf in the movie.

      • Hildegarde
        link
        fedilink
        611 hours ago

        She was included because she was stealth and no one knew. It only came out after the fact.

        Most trans people were invisible at the time. You either did all the surgeries, fully passed, and cut off everyone who knew you pre-transition, or you didn’t get get to live a normal life.

        She wasn’t there because the filmmakers wanted to be progressive.