• @chiliedogg
    link
    English
    14 hours ago

    I just gave you hundreds of sources you ignorant ass. Including the AP, the BBC, the NYT, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, and more.

    When you demand sources for what’s being reported by literally every major news outlet, you just make it clear you either are intentially trying to mislead or are intentionally uninformed.

    If it’s the first, then you’re doing a terrible job and you may find yourself falling out of a window when the boss finds out how shitty you are at your job. If it’s the second, then it isn’t my job to educate your stupid, ignorant ass.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 hours ago

      you gave me the “let me google that for you” link… which was really funny, 20 years ago

      it’s really simple: when making strong claims, cite a source.
      not only does it make present conversation more meaningful, it also future proofs discussion because google broke the “time range” search feature and the internet is becoming the memory hole from 1984.

      is the point of talking about things on here to be right, or to actually cooperate and figure stuff out?

    • @Marleyinoc
      link
      English
      04 hours ago

      He probably gets paid to argue. Block the little traitorous bitch and stop arguing with him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        you, looking at your post history: we ought to be friends… and not call each other names… you fuck-faced mcpoopypants

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 hours ago

        wow, how much do they pay you to say dumb stuff like that?
        since when did requesting a source make someone a “traitorous bitch”?