The shitshow in the Whitehouse yesterday really brought it to light - the U.S. can no longer be trusted with our secrets. Its time to leave 5 eyes. I would create a new intelligence sharing union with the other 3 members, on condition that they also leave. Inviting France and other EU states might also make sense.

  • @[email protected]M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83 days ago

    You’re right but it would be enormously complex. We’d actually have to set up a new, separate system, first, then leave, and do that without upsetting a notoriously thin-skinned sociopath, who would still, during the process, have all our secrets.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      183 days ago

      I disagree - everything we send goes to Moscow. Everything we get comes from Moscow. There is no value for us. There’s nothing to lose by leaving.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 days ago

        I’m afraid there is, because Trump’s vindictiveness won’t stop with intelligence! Tariffs would be just the start.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 days ago

            Yes. Again, I did start my comment with ‘You’re right’. But it’s also the case that what you - and I - are advocating for would, in the short term, be a boon to terrorism and organised crime, and may well have knock on effects for the economy, too.

            My point is not that we shouldn’t do it, but that it would have massive, unpredictable consequences!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 days ago

          Wow, this is like the country level of justifying staying with an abuser. If the USA is unreliable and insecure, because of trumps, but more because the American people voted him in and their government sees fit not to prevent the kind of issues he’s causing. Then it’s better to leave and face consequences, and retaliate appropriately now, than suffer and still face those same consequences later.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 days ago

            No, it isn’t, because the first thing I said was:

            You’re right

            And the rest of my comment simply pointed out that it would be complex and risky - which is true.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 hours ago

              Yes, but you’re discounting the fact that all intelligence is shared in the mean time. All large intergovernmental organisations are complex. The USA is likely compromised. Sharing data with them would undermine the new entity.