• Pup Biru
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -34 hours ago

    okay so what’s your next step? because letting the right win has to be the stupidest ever way to influence change to the left

    • @Ensign_Crab
      link
      English
      24 hours ago

      because letting the right win has to be the stupidest ever way to influence change to the left

      Maybe the party shouldn’t have done it then. There will never be anything that will get Democrats to move to the left. You know it. You love it. It’s why you’re gloating with your spoiled milk analogy.

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          23 hours ago

          Because leftists can’t get a win.

          Oh, you gonna gloat too? Ok, hows about the party hold honest primaries for fucking once. Or primaries at all? How’s that for step 2? Then again, since you love your sour milk, that’s a nonstarter too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            03 hours ago

            You’re a bit weird, I’m still not talking about Democrats, I’m talking about leftists.

            What can leftists do to get a win?

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              13 hours ago

              Well, they could take over the green party. They’re a small party with even smaller primaries. The left could just saunter in and take it. From there, they could extract concessions from Democrats in exchange for not running. Or run. If Democrats don’t want to split the vote, they don’t have to field a candidate. It’s not like they’re interested in winning in the first place.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 hours ago

                Why the green party? Why not primary vulnerable downballot democrats?

                Use the same tactic the right has used on the republican party over the last 20 years to move the opposition party our direction. Is the green party uniquely positioned or something? They have a terrible track record and at least at one point about a decade ago, were thought to be infested with .ru shills.

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Why not primary vulnerable downballot democrats?

                  Because I’ve seen how that goes. The party protects incumbents as long as their opponents are progressive.

                  Compare how the party protected anti-choice anti-labor pro-nra Henry Cuellar to how it abandoned Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman.

                  Also, your question assumes fair primaries. Democrats don’t do those.