• Dr. Moose
    link
    English
    541 year ago

    Don’t waste tax money on this. If some rich idiots want to unalive themselves in a can to see some garbage at the bottom of the ocean - let them.

    • @Shard
      link
      English
      271 year ago

      We’ve already wasted money on them.

      Who do you think paid the coast guards and navies of the multiple nationals that conducted the deep sea search for Titan?

      Hint: Tax payers.

      • jkmooney
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        I don’t know about the others, but Coast Guard gets paid regardless. These events justify their budget. It wasn’t an “extra cost” to the taxpayers.

    • @EdibleFriend
      link
      English
      251 year ago

      …please leave ‘unalive’ on places like tik tok.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I was using it satirically and I honestly think that’s where this word is going. I find it fascinating though - it’s absolutely meaningless but it also sounds safe and incredibly artificial. It’s full of these paradoxical features that make this word really fun. I’d invest meme points into it tbh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        It’s too late man it’s now apart of the modern language. Insert Abe Simpson “I used to be hip…” meme.

        • @EdibleFriend
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          It really only is, for the most part, on places like tik tok and youtube where the word ‘dead’ is banned. And it occasionally slips out into normal society but…just…no.

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Contrary to popular belief the word “dead” is not banned on tiktok or youtube. Do people really think that the censor can be tricked by a synonym a 5 yeard old could come up with?

            Real argument is to protect people with trauma as seeing “dead” can be a trigger but even then it doesn’t make much sense as it’s the same word - just spelled differently. The only way this would work if we come up with new word for “death” every few months before our brains re-asocciate the synonyms but that’s absurdly impractical and impossible to implement. I do think it’s an interesting language phenomena tho and is fun to explore.

            • @EdibleFriend
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              Now that I look yeah…your right. I fell for interwebs bullshit. But completely agree on you about the constant changing of words. And going going back to the original though…if you are so triggered by the word dead/death…im sorry but you just need to learn to live with that. Society cant abandon such incredibly basic words because of people like that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I don’t know, but to me “suicide” and “kill” seem like the words that would’ve been banned. Not “dead”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            I think the slippage is going to increase. It’s a full word not like “LOL”, people will say it IRL.

            • @Ryumast3r
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              I’ve never heard someone say it irl yet.

              Until then

              • @EdibleFriend
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                like 8 years ago i worked with this girl who would fucking say hashtag. like someone would say something really crazy and she would be like “hashtag really?”

                I…really hated her…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                I teach middle school. During the school year, I heard it two dozen times daily.

                It’s getting tiresome already.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      171 year ago

      I’ll be honest, I don’t think that’s a sensible approach. Yes, it’s billionaires offing themselves, sure. But regulations are quite important, in particular in sensible and critical areas like this.

      If they also protect some billionaires that’s an unfortunate side effect, but overall these regulations would be very good to have. The rise of venture capitalist attitude outside of IT is only going to get worse, so the sooner we can establish rules against that the better.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Could you expand on why? Surely there must be more important areas to spend resource to regulate than protecting some rich people hobbie that only few people per year partake in. It would cost millions of dollars to regulate something like this effectively. The only argument I can think off is that it could cost less to regulate than to “save and rescue” these idiots but save and rescue is not a pro bono service for the most part either. They or their insurance will have to cover the costs of this.

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            dunno man the whole thing is a bit absurd. At the same time literally over 400 people drowned trying to escape poverty. It’s really hard to care for this particular human value when there’s this massive injustice. Reality is we don’t have infinite resources and attention - we should direct it more efficiently than this.

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I was this close to agreeing with you and then I remembered there was a kid on that sub, and now I’m thinking this was a really shitty thing to say.

      • jkmooney
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        A kid and a researcher who made regular trips to document the flora growing on the site.

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        The thing is that it’s not a binary on/off issue it’s resource distribution issue. Why should we collectively spend absurd amount of resources to protect this extremely small entertainment niche when there are literally people dying from preventable issues. I’m not an utalitarian but it’s really hard not to agree with their philosophy when you see events like this: rich people die in some absurd hobby and we spend more protecting them than hundreds of poor people literally drowning at the same time trying to escape unlivable poverty conditions. Like, I’m sorry man, but maybe you should redirect your anger there.