• edric
      link
      fedilink
      1823 hours ago

      No, that is an important distinction. People have different threat models. For most people, privacy without anonymity may suffice (i.e. I don’t mind that you know it’s me, I just don’t want you to see what I’m sending). For others (i.e. journalists, whistleblowers, more privacy-centric individuals), anonymity may be equally important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 hours ago

        Exactly. And requiring a phone number enables convenience features like:

        • account recovery
        • find contacts
        • be found by other people

        Once you have an account, you can disable the phone number and use Hawks usernames instead (can be changed at will) of disable discovery entirely.

        It’s a pretty reasonable limitation IMO.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 minutes ago

          “Account recovery”, yeah but by whom?

          “Find contacts”, dont you know who u wana talk with?

          “be found by other people” ???